Manufacturing teams work hard to improve efficiency, but sometimes the biggest slowdowns come from well-intentioned “best practices” that no longer work.
From over-tightening tolerances to adding unnecessary secondary operations, many long-standing manufacturing beliefs are costing companies time and money without actually improving quality.
Let’s break down some of the most common precision manufacturing myths—and what you should be doing instead.
🔹 The Belief: The more precise the tolerance, the better the part.
🔹 The Reality: Not every component needs extreme precision—and forcing ultra-tight tolerances on non-critical features can increase machining time, scrap rates, and costs without adding real value.
🔹 Example: A medical device manufacturer required a ±0.0005” tolerance on a non-critical plastic housing component.
The result?
❌ Longer machining times due to excessive precision requirements
❌ Higher rejection rates from parts slightly outside spec
❌ Unnecessary cost increases
💡 The Fix:
✅ Determine critical tolerances vs. non-critical tolerances—not all dimensions need extreme precision.
✅ Work with manufacturing engineers early to optimize tolerances for cost-effective production.
✅ Apply tight tolerances only where functionally necessary, not across the entire part.
🔹 The Belief: Adding additional machining, finishing, or inspection steps will result in higher-quality parts.
🔹 The Reality: Too many secondary operations slow down production, drive up costs, and can introduce unnecessary complexity.
🔹 Example: A stamped electrical component was being sent for extra polishing and grinding, even though the added finishing wasn’t functionally necessary.
The result?
❌ Longer cycle times and bottlenecks
❌ Higher labor and equipment costs
❌ No measurable improvement in part function
💡 The Fix:
✅ Only add secondary operations when necessary for function or appearance.
✅ Use in-die tapping or forming when possible to eliminate extra steps.
✅ Automate quality control with vision systems or inline measurement tools instead of manual inspections.
🔹 The Belief: The more machining a part undergoes, the more precise and reliable it will be.
🔹 The Reality: Over-machining increases cycle times and material waste while often offering no real performance advantage.
🔹 Example: A stamped metal bracket was originally designed to be CNC-machined for added precision. However, engineers redesigned the part for progressive stamping instead.
The result?
✅ Production time reduced from minutes to seconds per part
✅ Material waste significantly lowered
✅ Part precision remained within functional tolerances
💡 The Fix:
✅ Consider high-precision stamping, forming, or laser cutting instead of over-relying on machining.
✅ Evaluate cost vs. precision needs—if stamping or forming meets requirements, machining may be unnecessary.
✅ Reduce machining steps by optimizing initial tooling designs.
Many long-standing precision manufacturing practices are based on outdated assumptions—and they could be slowing down production instead of improving it.
By optimizing tolerances, minimizing unnecessary secondary operations, and reducing over-machining, manufacturers can:
✔️ Speed up production while maintaining quality
✔️ Reduce costs and minimize material waste
✔️ Improve overall process efficiency
The key to better manufacturing isn’t doing more—it’s doing what actually works.
Gromax Precision Die & Mfg., Inc. specializes in designing and manufacturing precision metal stamped parts and tooling, including progressive stamping dies and custom equipment. With an on-time delivery rate of 99.68% and a defect rate of just 0.066%, the company ensures exceptional reliability and quality.
Gromax is ISO 9001:2015 certified and ITAR registered, serving industries such as medical, defense, aerospace, industrial automation, and automotive with high-quality, innovative solutions.