







Hole location, bend angle, formed height, flatness, or other critical dimensions move toward or beyond specification limits.
Increasing burr height, rough edges, rollover, or fracture changes can indicate punch and die wear, clearance issues, or changing material behavior
Springback, bend position, draw depth, free height, or formed relationships become inconsistent from run to run or coil to coil.
Scratches, galling, dents, scoring, discoloration, or plating damage appear during stamping, handling, or downstream processing.
Parts still appear dimensionally acceptable but create fit, retention, contact, insertion, or movement problems in the final assembly.
Quality issues occur only at certain speeds, after tool warm-up, during specific coil lots, or after extended production runs.
Review punches, die sections, forms, pilots, guides, stripper components, cams, springs, and wear surfaces for damage, looseness, or progressive wear.
Compare alloy, thickness, temper, hardness, surface condition, coil set, and lot-to-lot consistency where material behavior may be affecting the process.
Check shut height, ram condition, bolster alignment, feed pitch, pilot engagement, strip tracking, speed, and setup repeatability.
Evaluate lubricant type, amount, application consistency, and whether friction changes are contributing to galling, forming variation, or tool wear.
Review carrier stability, pitch, station timing, pilot release, forming sequence, cutoff, and how variation in one station can carry into later operations.
Confirm that gages, fixtures, datum setup, measurement technique, and sampling method are capable of detecting the actual process change
Establish exactly what changed, when it changed, how often it occurs, and which dimensions or functional conditions are affected.
Separate suspect material or production where necessary and establish temporary inspection controls while the cause is investigated.
Review good versus bad parts, tooling condition, material lots, setup records, press conditions, and inspection results.
Use dimensional data, controlled trials, tool inspection, and process evidence to identify the factor or combination of factors driving the defect.
Repair or adjust tooling, process settings, material controls, lubrication, inspection, or secondary operations, then confirm that the corrected process remains stable.
Verify that affected dimensions remain within specification through the expected production window.
Confirm that repaired or adjusted tooling is operating without abnormal wear, misalignment, or repeated manual intervention.
Check that the process remains stable across normal material variation within the approved specification.
Evaluate whether feed, forming, lubrication, press setup, and secondary operations produce consistent results over time.
Confirm that the measurement method can detect future drift before defective parts reach downstream assembly.
To protect customer confidentiality and controlled technical information, Gromax does not publicly display customer-specific drawings, specifications, or sensitive part details without appropriate authorization.
Images shown are illustrative only and are used to represent the types of parts, geometries, and manufacturing capabilities Gromax supports. They do not depict specific customer designs or proprietary technical data.